Writer: Basil Foo
Published: Fri, 18 Jan 2013
SUBANG JAYA: Residents’ associations (RAs) in Selangor
will be invited to give their input on gated and guarded (G&G) communities
at a seminar being organised soon by the state.
The event, to be hosted by the
Selangor Land and Mines Office (PTG), will be
held next week and will seek to draw up guidelines for G&G
communities.
“Once the guidelines are drawn
up, they will be brought to the state executive council to be endorsed,” said
state executive councillor Teresa Kok.
She said there have been many
complaints against RAs which have chosen to employ makeshift G&G
infrastructure around their neighbourhood.
Among the security measures
taken by residents include installing guardhouses, boom gates and barriers made
of metal barrels and barbed wire.
Some RAs have permanently
blocked roads which prevent emergency services like police cars or fire engines
from passing through.
Kok gave an example of the
Taman Puchong Hartamas development where a guardhouse erected by the developer
had to be torn down by the local council last year.
The structure was deemed
illegal as it did not obtain a Temporary Occupancy Licence (TOL) from the
Subang Jaya Municipal Council (MPSJ).
“Since the guardhouse was
demolished, the area experienced an increase in crime, resulting in a
wave of about eight break-ins,” she said.
Residents were also left
fuming when Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) officers tore down a security
barrier in their neighbourhood along Jalan SS20/17 last January.
Residents claimed the barriers
brought down crime after they were installed.
Previously, they were the
victims of break-ins, snatch thefts and even assaulted with cleavers.
The G&G concept has been a
contentious issue in the state, sometimes pitting neighbours against each other
as they disagree on fencing up their community.
Some RAs or Rukun Tetangga
(RT) see barricades as a safety feature.
Those who disagree are usually
concerned with the closure of roads which may inconvenience them and hinder
emergency services.
The state government issued
its own guidelines in 2010 which proposed that at least 80% of residents must
support the G&G concept before implementation.
This differs from a Federal
government guideline which suggests only a 51% support.
“I believe this has to be
decided on a case-by-case basis. It should be allowed if there are no
objections (from surrounding residents),” Kok added.